Social manipulation causes cooperation in keas
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Social learning affects object exploration and manipulation in keas, Nestor notabilis
Correspondence: L. Huber, Department of Theoretical Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Vienna, Biocenter, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria (email: [email protected]). M. Taborsky is now at the Division of Behavioural Ecology, University of Berne, Wohlenstrasse 50a, CH-3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland. Social learning affects object exploration and manipulation in keas,...
متن کاملmanipulation in dubbing and subtitling
پژوهش حاضر در چارچوب مکتب دستکاری قرار گرفت و با استفاده از تقسیم بندی دوکات (2007) از شیوه های دستکاری، به دنبال یافتن پاسخ برای پرسش های زیر بود: 1-رایج ترین شیوه دستکاری در دوبله فیلم ها کدام است؟ 2-رایج ترین شیوه دستکاری در زیرنویس فیلم ها کدام است؟ 3-دستکاری در دوبله فیلم ها رایج تر است یا در زیرنویس آن ها؟ این پژوهش از نوع تحقیقات توصیفی- مقایسه ای و پیکره ای می باشد. پیکره تحقیق شا...
Cooperation in Evolving Social Networks
W study the problem of cooperative behavior emerging in an environment where individual behaviors and interaction structures coevolve. Players not only learn which strategy to adopt by imitating the strategy of the best-performing player they observe, but also choose with whom they should interact by selectively creating and/or severing ties with other players based on a myopic cost-benefit com...
متن کاملSocial Goals in Conversational Cooperation
We propose a model where dialog obligations arise from the interplay of social goals and intentions of the participants: when an agent is addressed with a request, the agent's decision to commit to the requester's linguistic and domain goals is motivated by a trade-o between the preference for preventing a negative reaction of the requester and the cost of the actions needed to satisfy the goals.
متن کاملOpinion Manipulation in Social Networks
In this work, we are interested in finding the most efficient use of a budget to promote an opinion by paying agents within a group to supplant their true opinions. We model opinions as continuous scalars ranging from 0 to 1 with 1 (0) representing extremely positive (negative) opinion. We focus on asymmetric confidence between agents. The iterative update of an agent corresponds to the best re...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Animal Behaviour
سال: 1996
ISSN: 0003-3472
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0147